Comparative international power

What would happen if the United States broke up into two new nations – New America, and Alinsky? How powerful would the new nations be, with respect to each other, and with respect to other countries?

The Mises Institute published several articles addressing the issue of national power, based on ideas developed by Michael Beckley and Paul Bairoch. They came to the conclusion that the simplest metric predicting outcomes in international conflicts is this: multiply the nominal GDP of a country by its nominal GDP per capita.

Beckley found that his metric successfully predicted the outcomes of most of the major prolonged international conflicts in the last 200 years. However, his metric predicts lopsided advantages for the United States versus China, and especially the United States versus Afghanistan. Clearly the Beckley metric exaggerates the importance of conventional warfare.

Nevertheless, I thought it would be a useful exercise to follow the Mises Institute’s lead and use this metric to examine international power as it stands today, as well as the results of a presumed break-up of the United States. Here are three of their articles:

For the Mises Institute, the two successor states of the United States have 27 conservative states, and 23 leftist states + DC respectively. Of the purple states I have shown in previous maps, Arizona and Georgia join the conservative grouping; Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin join the leftist grouping. Obviously this split does not consider the issue of regional secessions from states.

I modified the Beckley metric to make the competition between nations somewhat more equal, and therefore more difficult for the more powerful country to achieve a decisive victory. I did so by making two changes. 1) I replaced nominal GDP per capita by PPP (purchasing power parity) GDP per capita; this reflects what may be a higher or lower cost of living in each country. 2) After multiplying nominal GDP by PPP GDP per capita, I took the square root, so that increased GDP is not counted twice in the multiplication.

The result is shown in the map below for currently existing nations. The most powerful nation, the United States, is blue; less powerful nations are green, brown, and red.

Below is a table of the power of the most powerful nations, according to this modified Beckley index, assuming the current power of the United States is 100.

countrypower index
United States100.0
leftist states82.7
conservative states61.6
United Kingdom29.8
South Korea23.2

On this same scale, Brazil scores 12.3, and India scores 11.1.

Notice that even after a break-up, the two successor states to the United States each remain more powerful than any other nation, so we need not fear an imminent invasion.

5 thoughts on “Comparative international power

    1. Those who are engaged in voter fraud are the least likely to be worried about it. Usually, this is because when they “cheat” people into office, those people are not likely to prosecute the source of their power.

      Liked by 1 person

  1. In your secession calculations, have you taken account of the large areas of Federally-owned land in many states? Also, are you presuming that the resources of the military will be divided fairly and peacefully? I see no reason to expect that to happen.

    Unfortunately, the time for secession was in 2009, after 0bama showed who he was, but everyone was spooked by his fake “blackness” and terrified to be called racist. Of course, that was the plan, and it worked perfectly.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s